Quote:
Originally Posted by msufan
|
here we go + vote for the topic =)
1 780 $92.31 lava-lava 2010/02/16 2505
2 760 $61.54 msufan 2010/02/15 1670
3 730 $46.15 charger09 2010/02/15 1253
4 690 $0.00 afort56 2010/02/15 1002
5 640 $0.00 Skill 2010/02/15 835
6 500 $0.00 aimlyn80 2010/02/15 671
7 500 $0.00 joker 2010/02/15 671
8 390 $0.00 lgtrader79 2010/02/15 557
9 360 $0.00 tbird93 2010/02/15 501
10 240 $0.00 poppea 2010/02/15 455
11 0 $0.00 Flignats 2010/02/15 418
I've noticed the other weeks aswell, that charger puts alot effort into playing, especially in solitaire. Thus she enjoys playing I hope.
But I doubt you can go through all possible plays, 3card-solitaire has unbelievable many possibilities. Even though this week is a very limited layout, you'll find way over 100 different ways of play.
yet I haven't got a msg back from her, so those 980 keeps bothering me aswell.
Flignats do you know how to get 980 on last weeks layout? (yes or no). If not how can you be certain it's valid?
Please don't let this discussion run into some general "how to validate games". You have to agree that those 3card-solitaire games, especially those which are unsolvable, are kinda unique. In particular due to it's finite possibilities there exists at least one optimal play, thus a highest possible score. Scores can be easy validated by showing the way it was played.
Due to this "easiness" of proof, I can understand why players have doubts, in scores they didn't archive especially if you invest alot time and plays into a certain layout.