Unfair Gaming Worldwinner/Information about all the Cheats(BOTS) EXPERIMENTAL PURPOSE

[snitcface2003]

most of the complaints i've heard about worldwinner have to do with 'worldwinner' comps, i.e. comps in which ww hosts the games and you compete agains the 'community'.

first of all, you guys KNOW there are a multitude of cheaters and some even ADMIT to cheating themselves.

so tell me this....if you are a LEGIT player, how do you expect to cheat the CHEATERS? the ONLY way to do that is to cheat.

obviously there is a WRONG way to CHEAT and a RIGHT way to cheat on worldwinner. then, there is the LEGIT way of playing which is just AVOID ww comps and play FRIENDS...

why is that so hard for some of you to understand?? don't like cheaters?? don't play ww comps. want fair games? play buddies.

it's not rocket science.

[voxleo]

I just posted a note about WW and their "Win it now" Creative Math in the "players talk" section, perhaps I should have posted it here instead.

[Grengoddess]

most of the complaints i've heard about worldwinner have to do with 'worldwinner' comps, i.e. comps in which ww hosts the games and you compete agains the 'community'.

first of all, you guys KNOW there are a multitude of cheaters and some even ADMIT to cheating themselves.

so tell me this....if you are a LEGIT player, how do you expect to cheat the CHEATERS? the ONLY way to do that is to cheat.

obviously there is a WRONG way to CHEAT and a RIGHT way to cheat on worldwinner. then, there is the LEGIT way of playing which is just AVOID ww comps and play FRIENDS...

why is that so hard for some of you to understand?? don't like cheaters?? don't play ww comps. want fair games? play buddies.

it's not rocket science.

or you can just play on king instead.....you know the place where there is a competent abuse/fraud department.

@sharkbate - no we arent hiding that fact. in fact we are rubbing it in their faces until they get the point ^_~ i sent a very long email to John about this. why John? Cuz i ABHOR talking with Peter or Mike. thats why

[dpaull414]

I can only read about how wonderful King is for so long before I feel compelled to chime in. Perhaps WW wrongs more people than King does overall, but King is not perfect and there is a chance they'll mess with you!

I've been banned by both. WW restored me within a day. King took a week. King banned my wife because they accused her of being a duplicate account and never restored her.

Moral of my story is you play on their sites only because they let you and they can pull the plug at any time and keep your balance... If you are a money depositor I doubt they'll mess with you. If you win money, just keep your fingers crossed that things work out and they keep letting you login!

just my 2 cents..
don

or you can just play on king instead.....you know the place where there is a competent abuse/fraud department.

@sharkbate - no we arent hiding that fact. in fact we are rubbing it in their faces until they get the point ^_~ i sent a very long email to John about this. why John? Cuz i ABHOR talking with Peter or Mike. thats why

[Grengoddess]

king isnt perfect. NOTHING is perfect. but king is sure a lot better at recognizing fraudulent activity than WW. and its not that WW does the "innocent until proven guilty thing". what WW does is guess at everything because their cheat detection systems are roughly obsolete. so it SEEMS like thats how they do things.

[snitcface2003]

"or you can just play on king instead.....you know the place where there is a competent abuse/fraud department. "

yes, that is an EXCELLENT suggestion. too bad king doesn't make it as easy to search out players in my skill range as on worldwinner or else i would be on king. i've brought the subject up to king but they don't care (apparently), so i stay at ww where i can search players according to favorite games and look at skill levels.

sending challenges to the highest ranked players by average players is unacceptable in my opinion.

[dpaull414]

So I've recently started issuing challenges on King after reading here that you could do up to 10 players. And it has been extremely lucrative so far. The only real problem is finding players is tedious. But the payoff is so much better than a 2 player challenge at WW it is worth it.

So what I do is play a warmup game and when you beat somebody, go to their profile, see if you'd want to play them for money and then see who they have played in that game in the 'latest wins' or 'latest defeats' in that game. And keep following the links until you have your 10 marks. Then setup your 10 person battle and hope for the best!

yes, that is an EXCELLENT suggestion. too bad king doesn't make it as easy to search out players in my skill range as on worldwinner or else i would be on king. i've brought the subject up to king but they don't care (apparently), so i stay at ww where i can search players according to favorite games and look at skill levels.

sending challenges to the highest ranked players by average players is unacceptable in my opinion.

[snitcface2003]

great info. thanks. i'll use your advice. it's too bad king only allows 10 challenges. WW allows up to 25!!!! and i thought THEY were shooting themselves in the foot. way to go KING!!!!

[Kona]

Thank you.

It's refreshing to receive direct confirmation that I've been throwing my money away and losing to cheaters. Makes for better and more heart warming Kodak moments of my time there at WW.

Out of thousands of players at WW, I believe we can probably name on just two hands, the players who win 95% of the time.

Bravo

[Grengoddess]

great info. thanks. i'll use your advice. it's too bad king only allows 10 challenges. WW allows up to 25!!!! and i thought THEY were shooting themselves in the foot. way to go KING!!!!

WW allows up to 25 with a max of one other challenger


King allowes up to 10 with a max of 9 other challengers

25 X 2 = 50

10 X 10 = 100

king STILL wins :P